Baseball, Like a Spraying Cat,
Needs to be Fixed
PART 1: The Strike Zone or Lack Thereof
So it’s baseball season once again. All the boys
of summer are out in full force with thoughts of pennant races and Fall
Classics, peanuts and Cracker Jacks. For half the year, all is right with
the world. Even while all is so NOT right with the game.
It’s always amazing to me how those that suck at
the teat of baseball … those that swear to “eat, sleep and breathe” the
sport … those that scream from the top of their soapboxes that baseball
is THE be all and end all of sport in America … can be so blatantly ignorant
of all it’s faults. What’s worse is that these dolts actually DEFEND the
faults with one blanket answer … “That’s part of the game.” … all while
casually shrugging their shoulders and cocking their head, wrapped in that
safe, warm cocoon of their own denial. These dolts are known to the rest
of the world as “purists”. “Purists” in ANY sport suck. But baseball purists
really, really suck.
I can already feel all the purists cringing, ready
to jump up and start their ankle-biting, so let me qualify myself so you
can more accurately focus your hate. I have a healthy respect for the game
of baseball. I was not born with it, like so many of you idiots claim to
be. Mine was developed over time. I much preferred to play football and
basketball as it offered a much more physical challenge than standing and
waiting for someone to hit your way. I do not argue that baseball is a
sport, as opposed to other “activities” or “games” like NASCAR or golf.
I understand the concepts of baseball and enjoy the subtleties of pitching
and fielding. And I can celebrate a New York Mets National League Championship
with the best of them. I am no overweight couch potato who is just talking
out of my ass. In fact, I can be considered a pretty good athlete. I still
play football, basketball, and while I have never played hardball, I have
been known to contribute some fine hitting, fielding and running to one
of my softball leagues. I am certainly in MUCH better shape than several
purists that I know. So with that …
According to the Official Rules, "The STRIKE
ZONE is that area over home plate the upper limit of which is a horizontal
line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the
uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the hollow beneath the
kneecap. The Strike Zone shall be determined from the batter's stance as
the batter is prepared to swing at a pitched ball."
Baseball’s strike zone is clearly defined. There
should be no ifs and or buts about it. If a ball falls within that clearly
defined area, then it is a strike. Anything outside of that area is simply
NOT a strike.
Baseball’s strike zone is a joke. Umpires that routinely
make the wrong calls are an even bigger joke and should be replaced. An
umpire, like anyone else who works, is doing his JOB. At any other job,
if a worker performs poorly, he is reprimanded. If he performs consistently
poorly, he is fired. Not so with baseball. In fact, when an umpire can
be easily misled by a cunning pitcher, it is simply “part of the game”.
In effect, purists will tell you that “cheating” is “part of the game”.
Purists will tell you that a really good pitcher
will work an umpire by consistently throwing a ball to the outside corner
until he finds that comfort zone which the umpire will call a strike. However,
as the game goes on, that pitcher will continue to extend that zone counting
on the umpire to have fallen into his psychological trap therefore giving
him a strike call. Now, when pitchers throw a strike and it is called such,
that’s good pitching. When pitchers throw what is clearly a ball and it
is called a strike, THAT is cheating. Intentional or not, someone is being
misled, and no one is held accountable for it. Hence, someone is cheating.
Why then do we have an umpire at all?
Sports TV can track a hockey puck travelling at
100 miles per hour, or draw a 10 yard marker on the field of play so with
today’s technology, surely we can devise some system that will, WITHOUT
FAIL, detect what is and what is NOT a strike. A simple laser grid that
is projected from the front of the plate can carve out the EXACT dimensions
of the strike zone. This grid would be invisible to the pitcher but can
easily be called up when a call is in dispute. If the pitch crosses the
plate and lands within the “area over home plate the upper limit of which
is a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and
the top of the uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the hollow
beneath the kneecap “ then it is a strike. Anything outside of that is
a ball. Do you question that logic? This clear, exact and perfectly defined
strike zone would then not be subject to cheating pitchers and farsighted
umpires. The game would be pure and right, the way purists always scream
it should be. Pitchers would not be overinflated for their skill to cheat
the system. They would in fact be celebrated for their ability to throw
an actual strike.
Purists will tell you that it is exactly that human
element for error that makes the game so exciting. Wrong. That human element
for error makes the game an arbitrary exercise that is dependent on the
mood of a bloated union monkey in a blue suit. If the call is wrong, then
it is WRONG. There is no question about it. A strike is a strike.
A ball is a ball.
Why are purists so resistant to the idea of having
games called correctly? Because purists suck. And baseball purists really,
really suck.
The Armchair QB
Look for the next installment of "For the Sport of
It" in the coming weeks. Until then, feel free to drop the
Armchair QB a line. |